Monthly book roundup – 2015 February

Books finished in February:
(Warning: reviews are unpolished and quickly written.)

The Rider (1978) by Tim Krabbé. Wonderful book. Dutch amateur road cyclist Tim Krabbé recounts how he raced the Tour de Mont Aigoual, known from Tour de France, interspersed with stories from his cycling career, Tour de France, and the nature of road racing. Recommended.

On Writing: 10th Anniversary Edition: A Memoir of the Craft (2001) by Stephen King. Very nice little book from Stephen King, where he tells about his becoming and experience of a writer. Part autobiographical, with King telling about his childhood experiences of pain, childhood and adolescence writing effort and other things, part practical advice, like read and write a lot, be disciplined, have someone in mind to write for. I do not know if I learned too much about actual writing, but I liked the anecdotes and the stories anyway. Recommended.

Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction (2001) by Ian J. Deary. Got its own review.

The Unknown Terrorist: A Novel (2008) by Richard Flanagan. A young woman suddenly finds herself a suspect in a terrorism case in an Australia that has instituted draconian terrorism laws. She is presumed guilty be the media, and consequently by the rest of the society. It is important to consider where we are heading regarding terrorism, etc., but the moral lessons are here way too spelled out – long passages describing how the protagonist now that she is treated unfairly comes to realize that was how she used to treat others, etc. And there is a caricature villain from the media. Not recommended.

The Village Effect: How Face-to-Face Contact Can Make Us Healthier, Happier, and Smarter (2014) by Susan Pinker. Though quite concerned about causal identification I am not part of the Endogeneity Taliban, and I find descriptive stuff interesting valuable, but I am frustrated by presentation of statistical associations followed by suggestive or explicit causal language, even if occasionally accompanied by acknowledging other possibilities and selection issues. Susan Pinker is not the worst offender in this regard that I have come across, but a pretty serious offender she is. In particular with all the talk about “the female effect” and the effects of marriage , but often also casually, as with “the effect of eating dinner together”. I accept much of her message that face-to-face social interactions are important and perhaps undervalued in today’s society, the problem is that this is almost lost in hyperbole and one-sided interpretation. Not recommended.

Ratings and old books are in the library.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.